Saturday, October 25, 2008

Thinking Activley

An important stimulus in my life which persuades me to think actively is the life work of Stephen Hawking dealing with theoretical physics. This particular field of science focuses on explaining through one empirical formula, the exact nature of our entire universe. I find this undertaking to be awesome and admirable due to the astronomical amount of math involved. I also enjoy benefiting from the peace of mind that it affords us when it comes to questions about our surroundings.

In contrast, when I am more inclined to give my mind a rest and think passively, then I can go for some neutral classical music by Bach, Beethoven, or Mozart, These artists combine emotion with sound to ease and relax the listener in most cases.

Saturday, October 18, 2008

Active vs. Passive Thinking

The most important influence upon my personal judgment is the United States Supreme Court.
It attempts to guide mankind towards a more advanced way of living by perpetually decoding profound messages from within the US Constitution.

Without the Supreme Court of the United States, the world as we know it today would not exist.
These nine Justices think actively, so that we can think passively.

Perhaps no other body of thinkers is more influential on mankind than the US Supreme Court.

Saturday, October 11, 2008

Problem solving...

A recent problem I encountered was that someone decided to steal my charging phone at work.
everyone quickly became a suspect who was scheduled to work between the hours just before the phone went missing until 24 hours thereafter.
I was not getting answers quickly enough so I alerted the authorities.
Then everyone began helping me search.
Long story short, the phone was not found.
The search continues for the phone but I solved the problem of indifference and lack of cooperation with a simple phone call...from a landline!

Analysing Issues (European spelling of "Analyse")

The subject of this blog is analyzing issues.

The Issue I wish to highlight regerdless of relevance is whether or not the economy is in trouble or if these recent economic developments are inherent to the economy itself and will be resolved through the natural course of commerce.
I am of the latter opinion in that I believe that only a fool believes that the stock market will experience steady and constant growth given the current financial parameters.
Which is why a new "Financial Buffer" must be applied and built into the market, requiring Government concern, regulation and oversight.
Similar to the 700 billion dollar bailout plan, But I would have already had the "bailout" money in place as a parachute fund.
Basically, I'm saying that the economy is an issue or is not an issue depending on ones vantage point.